Quotient Sets and Partitions

The quotient set A/ρ consists of all equivalence classes of the set A under the relation ρ.

That is, all elements of A that belong to the same equivalence class [a] are represented collectively by the single element [a] in A/ρ.

The equivalence classes of A under ρ form what is known as a partition of the set.

What is a partition? A partition is a collection of non-empty subsets (called parts) of a set such that:

[1] The union of all the parts equals the original set: $$ \bigcup A_n = A $$
[2] The parts are pairwise disjoint: $$ A_a \cap A_b = \emptyset $$

Examples

Example 1

Let A = {1, 2, 3, 4}

Let F be a collection of subsets of A:

$$ F = \{ \{1\}, \{3,4\} \} $$

F is not a partition because it satisfies only two of the required three properties:

  • F is non-empty
  • The subsets in F are mutually disjoint

However, the union of these subsets does not cover the entire set A - the element 2 is missing.

Example 2

Again, let A = {1, 2, 3, 4}

And let F consist of the subsets:

$$ F = \{ \{1\}, \{3,4\}, \{2\} \} $$

This time, F is a valid partition because it satisfies all three conditions.

We can now state the fundamental theorem of equivalence relations:

  • Given an equivalence relation ρ on a set A, the corresponding equivalence classes (i.e., the quotient set A/ρ) define a partition of A.
  • Conversely, every partition of A determines an equivalence relation ρ, where each subset in the partition corresponds to a distinct equivalence class.

Proof

An equivalence relation always relates each element to itself: aρa.

Therefore, the equivalence class [a] always contains at least the element a.

This applies to every element x = b, c, d, … in A.

As a result, equivalence classes are either completely disjoint or identical.

If an element x belongs to both [a] and [b], then x is related to both a and b:

$$ x \rho a \\ x \rho b $$

By symmetry and transitivity, it follows that a is also related to b:

$$ a \rho x \land x \rho b \Rightarrow a \rho b $$

In the context of equivalence relations, this implies that [a] and [b] are the same class:

$$ a \rho b \Rightarrow [a] = [b] $$

So, whenever two classes have a non-empty intersection, they must be equal: [a] ⋂ [b] ≠ ∅ ⇒ [a] = [b]

  • If [a] and [b] are disjoint, then [a] ⋂ [b] = ∅ ⇒ [a] ≠ [b]
  • If [a] and [b] are not disjoint, then [a] ⋂ [b] ≠ ∅ ⇒ [a] = [b]

This shows that the equivalence classes defined by ρ on A satisfy all the defining properties of a partition:

  • Each class is non-empty: by definition, it contains at least its own representative.
  • The union of all classes in A/ρ equals A: combining all elements from every class reconstructs the full set A.
  • The intersection of any two distinct classes is empty: if [a] ⋂ [b] ≠ ∅, then the two classes are actually the same.

Example

Let A be the set {1, 2, 3, 4}

$$ A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\} $$

Let F be the collection of subsets {1}, {2}, {3,4}:

$$ F = \{ \{1\}, \{3,4\}, \{2\} \} $$

We define an equivalence relation ρ on A such that:

$$ a \rho b $$

This means that a and b belong to the same subset of F:

$$ \forall a, b \in A,\quad a \rho b \Leftrightarrow \exists X \in F \text{ such that } \{a,b\} \subseteq X $$

The pairs of elements that satisfy this relation are:

$$ \rho_F = \{ (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (3,4), (4,3) \} $$

The quotient set A/ρ is made up of the following equivalence classes:

$$ A/\rho = \{ [1], [2], [3], [4] \} $$

Each class [x] includes all elements related to x:

$$ [1] = \{1\} \\ [2] = \{2\} \\ [3] = \{3, 4\} \\ [4] = \{3, 4\} $$

Note. Element 1 is only related to itself. The same is true for 2. Element 3 is related to both itself and 4 - and vice versa.

If we now express the quotient set in terms of sets of elements:

$$ A/\rho = \{ \{1\}, \{2\}, \{3,4\} \} $$

This quotient set A/ρ is identical to the partition F.

And so on.

 
 

Please feel free to point out any errors or typos, or share suggestions to improve these notes. English isn't my first language, so if you notice any mistakes, let me know, and I'll be sure to fix them.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinLinkedin
knowledge base

Equivalence Relations