De Zolt’s Postulate for Surfaces

What does De Zolt’s postulate state?

A surface can never be equivalent to the individual surfaces (i.e., parts) that compose it.
example showing parts of a surface

This is a fairly intuitive notion: no part of an object can be equivalent to the whole.

That’s precisely why it’s framed as a “postulate.”

What is a postulate? A postulate is a statement or principle within a mathematical or scientific framework that is accepted as true without proof. It serves as a foundational assumption from which further theorems and laws are logically derived.

Let’s take, for instance, an arbitrary surface S.

a generic surface S

Suppose we draw a line that divides surface S into two distinct regions, which we’ll label A and B.

surface divided into two regions

Two surfaces are considered equivalent if and only if they have the same area.

In this case, the total area of surface S is the sum of the areas of A and B:

$$ Area(S) = Area(A) + Area(B) $$

It follows, then, that neither A nor B can be equivalent to S, nor can S be equivalent to either of its parts.

In other words, a surface can never be equivalent to one of its constituent parts.

And so forth.

 

 
 

Please feel free to point out any errors or typos, or share suggestions to improve these notes. English isn't my first language, so if you notice any mistakes, let me know, and I'll be sure to fix them.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinLinkedin
knowledge base

Surfaces (Geometry)