The Category of Posets in Category Theory

In the category of posets (partially ordered sets), there can be at most one direct morphism $a \rightarrow b$ between any pair of objects $a, b$ within set P. Morphisms in this context are defined as order relations.

Typically, a poset is a set \(P\) with an order relation \(\leq\) that is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive.

$$ Poset (P, \leq) $$

This implies that within the set:

  • each element is equivalent to itself \( a = a \) (reflexivity),
  • if \(a \leq b\) and \(b \leq a\), then \(a = b\) (antisymmetry),
  • if \(a \leq b\) and \(b \leq c\), then \(a \leq c\) (transitivity).

These properties qualify posets as a category (\(P, \leq\)) with specific structures:

  • Objects: The elements of the set \(P\).
  • Morphisms: Functions between two objects \(a, b \in P\) that exist only if \(a \leq b\). There is a unique morphism for each pair \(a \leq b\), representing the order relation between \(a\) and \(b\). All order relations adhere to associativity.

    Note: Like other categories, all morphisms between two objects are part of the hom-set(a, b). Generally, all morphisms in set \(P\) are part of the set \(Mor(P)\).

  • Morphism Composition: If there are morphisms from \(a\) to \(b\) and from \(b\) to \(c\), reflecting \(a \leq b\) and \(b \leq c\), a direct and unique morphism from \(a\) to \(c\) must exist due to the transitivity of the order.
  • Identity Morphism: Each element \(a \in P\) inherently possesses an identity morphism due to the reflexive nature of the order relation.

Thus, a poset meets all the criteria of a category.

In essence, category theory applied to posets provides a structured and abstract framework for analyzing order relations within partially ordered sets.

    An Illustrative Example

    Each natural number \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) can be considered a set that includes all natural numbers less than \(n\), from \(0\) to \(n-1\).

    $$ \mathbb{N} = \{ 0,1,2,3,4,5,... \} $$

    The natural number \(0\) is defined as the empty set \(\emptyset\) since it lacks predecessors.

    $$ 0 = \{ \} $$

    Conversely, the natural number \(1\) is a singleton set, having only \(0\) as its predecessor.

    $$ 1 = \{ 0 \} $$

    Following this pattern, the natural number \(2\) is defined by its predecessors \(0\) and \(1\).

    $$ 2 = \{ 0,1 \} $$

    This structure implies that each natural number inherently forms a category where the objects are the numbers less than itself, and the morphisms reflect the natural or inclusion relations among these numbers.

    For example, consider the natural number \(3\) as a category.

    The category of number 3 consists of all natural numbers preceding it:

    $$ 3 = \{0, 1, 2\} $$

    Here, the objects are the numbers \(0\), \(1\), and \(2\).

    The morphisms are established through the natural order (\(\leq\)), where a morphism exists from one number to another if the former is less than or equal to the latter.

    The morphisms in this category include:

    $$ id_0: 0 \rightarrow 0 $$

    $$ id_1: 1 \rightarrow 1 $$

    $$ id_2: 2 \rightarrow 2 $$

    $$ f: 0 \rightarrow 1 $$

    $$ g: 0 \rightarrow 2 $$

    $$ h: 1 \rightarrow 2 $$

    The first three morphisms are identity morphisms, as each element relates to itself in the order \( \leq \). The other morphisms represent ascending order relations among different objects: \( 0 \leq 1 \), \( 0 \leq 2 \), and \( 1 \leq 2 \).

    The respective hom-sets are as follows:

    • hom(0, 0): Contains only the identity of \(0\), \(\text{id}_0\).
    • hom(1, 1): Contains only the identity of \(1\), \(\text{id}_1\).
    • hom(2, 2): Contains only the identity of \(2\), \(\text{id}_2\).
    • hom(0, 1): Contains the morphism \(f\), representing \(0 \leq 1\).
    • hom(0, 2): Contains the morphism \(g\), representing \(0 \leq 2\).
    • hom(1, 2): Contains the morphism \(h\), representing \(1 \leq 2\).

    Note: The hom-sets hom(1, 0), hom(2, 0), and hom(2, 1) are empty because no order relations descend from a larger to a smaller number.

    The morphism \(f\) composed with \(h\) results in \(g\), demonstrating the transitivity of the natural order.

    $$ h \circ f = g $$

    Graphically, this category can be depicted as follows:

    category diagram

    This diagram uses arrows to indicate morphisms, showing an ascending order relation.

    The set of all morphisms in this category includes six morphisms:

    $$ Mor(3) = \{ id_0, id_1, id_2, f, g, h \} $$

    In summary, this example illustrates how a set of natural numbers less than a given number can be organized into a category, with objects and morphisms reflecting the natural order relations. Here, the numbers themselves serve as objects, and their relational orderings as morphisms.

     
     

    Please feel free to point out any errors or typos, or share your suggestions to enhance these notes

    FacebookTwitterLinkedinLinkedin
    knowledge base

    Category Theory