Hausdorff's Theorem on Homeomorphisms
The theorem states that if \( f: X \to Y \) is a homeomorphism and \( X \) is a Hausdorff space, then \( Y \) will also be a Hausdorff space.
This means that being a Hausdorff space is a topological property preserved under homeomorphisms.
In other words, if there is a bijective and continuous mapping between \( X \) and \( Y \), with the inverse also continuous, and \( X \) has the property of being a Hausdorff space (i.e., for any two distinct points, there exist disjoint open neighborhoods containing each point), then \( Y \) will share this property.
The result leverages the fact that homeomorphisms preserve topological properties, and since the Hausdorff property is topological, \( Y \) inherits this from \( X \).
Note: In many sources, this is simply presented as a consequence of the fact that the Hausdorff property is a topological property, which is preserved under homeomorphisms.
A Practical Example
Consider two topological spaces:
- \( X = \mathbb{R} \), the real line with the standard topology.
- \( Y = (0, 1) \), the open interval with the topology induced by the real line.
Let's define a function \( f: \mathbb{R} \to (0, 1) \) that maps the real line onto the open interval \( (0, 1) \).
A well-known example of such a function is the sigmoid function, which compresses the values of \( \mathbb{R} \) into the interval \( (0, 1) \):
$$ f(x) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-x}} $$
This function takes real values and transforms them into numbers in the range (0, 1), excluding the endpoints.
Let's verify that \( f \) is a homeomorphism:
- Continuity: The function \( f(x) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-x}} \) is continuous because it is composed of continuous operations (exponentials and algebraic functions). It maps each real number to a point in the open interval \( (0, 1) \).
- Injectivity: The function is injective, meaning each \( x \in \mathbb{R} \) is mapped to a unique value \( f(x) \) in the interval \( (0, 1) \). The sigmoid function is strictly increasing, so it never takes the same value for different inputs.
- Continuity of the inverse: The inverse of the sigmoid function is given by: $$ f^{-1}(y) = \ln\left(\frac{y}{1 - y}\right) $$ This function is also continuous, ensuring that \( f \) is a homeomorphism.
We know that \( \mathbb{R} \), with the standard topology, is a Hausdorff space.
By the Hausdorff Theorem on Homeomorphisms, since \( f \) is a homeomorphism, \( (0, 1) \) must also be a Hausdorff space.
In conclusion, by the theorem, the open interval \( (0, 1) \) is a Hausdorff space because it is homeomorphic to \( \mathbb{R} \), which already possesses the Hausdorff property.
This example illustrates how a continuous, bijective mapping between \( \mathbb{R} \) and an open interval like \( (0, 1) \) preserves the Hausdorff topological property.
The Proof
We start with the following assumptions:
- \( f : X \to Y \) is a homeomorphism, meaning \( f \) is a bijective (injective and surjective) continuous function with a continuous inverse.
- The space \( X \) is a Hausdorff space.
We need to prove that \( Y \) is also a Hausdorff space. That is, for any two distinct points \( y_1, y_2 \in Y \), there must exist disjoint open neighborhoods containing them.
Since \( f \) is surjective, there exist points \( x_1, x_2 \in X \) such that \( f(x_1) = y_1 \) and \( f(x_2) = y_2 \).
For two distinct points \( x_1 \ne x_2 \), there exist disjoint open neighborhoods \( U_1 \) and \( U_2 \) in \( X \), such that \( x_1 \in U_1 \) and \( x_2 \in U_2 \), since \( X \) is Hausdorff.
Because \( f \) is injective, \( f(x_1)=y_1 \) and \( f(x_2)=y_2 \) imply that \( y_1 \neq y_2 \).
Now, since \( f \) is continuous (as it is a homeomorphism by assumption), the sets \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) are open in \( Y \), as the continuity of \( f \) ensures that the image of an open set in \( X \) is open in \( Y \).
Thus, the images of the open sets \( U_1 \) and \( U_2 \) in \( X \) are open sets \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) in \( Y \).
Furthermore, the sets \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) contain \( y_1 \) and \( y_2 \), respectively, because \( f(x_1) = y_1 \) and \( f(x_2) = y_2 \).
Finally, the sets \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) are disjoint. If there were a point \( z \in f(U_1) \cap f(U_2) \), then \( z = f(x_1') = f(x_2') \) for some \( x_1' \in U_1 \) and \( x_2' \in U_2 \), which would contradict the fact that \( U_1 \) and \( U_2 \) are disjoint in \( X \), and that \( f \) is injective.
Therefore, we have found two disjoint open neighborhoods \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) in \( Y \), containing \( y_1 \) and \( y_2 \), respectively.
Thus, we conclude that the space \( Y \) is Hausdorff.
We have demonstrated that if \( f : X \to Y \) is a homeomorphism and \( X \) is Hausdorff, then \( Y \) is also Hausdorff.
And so on.