Hausdorff's Theorem on Homeomorphisms

The theorem states that if \( f: X \to Y \) is a homeomorphism and \( X \) is a Hausdorff space, then \( Y \) will also be a Hausdorff space.

This means that being a Hausdorff space is a topological property preserved under homeomorphisms.

In other words, if there is a bijective and continuous mapping between \( X \) and \( Y \), with the inverse also continuous, and \( X \) has the property of being a Hausdorff space (i.e., for any two distinct points, there exist disjoint open neighborhoods containing each point), then \( Y \) will share this property.

The result leverages the fact that homeomorphisms preserve topological properties, and since the Hausdorff property is topological, \( Y \) inherits this from \( X \).

Note: In many sources, this is simply presented as a consequence of the fact that the Hausdorff property is a topological property, which is preserved under homeomorphisms.

A Practical Example

Consider two topological spaces:

  • \( X = \mathbb{R} \), the real line with the standard topology.
  • \( Y = (0, 1) \), the open interval with the topology induced by the real line.

Let's define a function \( f: \mathbb{R} \to (0, 1) \) that maps the real line onto the open interval \( (0, 1) \).

A well-known example of such a function is the sigmoid function, which compresses the values of \( \mathbb{R} \) into the interval \( (0, 1) \):

$$ f(x) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-x}} $$

This function takes real values and transforms them into numbers in the range (0, 1), excluding the endpoints.

Let's verify that \( f \) is a homeomorphism:

  1. Continuity: The function \( f(x) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-x}} \) is continuous because it is composed of continuous operations (exponentials and algebraic functions). It maps each real number to a point in the open interval \( (0, 1) \).
  2. Injectivity: The function is injective, meaning each \( x \in \mathbb{R} \) is mapped to a unique value \( f(x) \) in the interval \( (0, 1) \). The sigmoid function is strictly increasing, so it never takes the same value for different inputs.
  3. Continuity of the inverse: The inverse of the sigmoid function is given by: $$ f^{-1}(y) = \ln\left(\frac{y}{1 - y}\right) $$ This function is also continuous, ensuring that \( f \) is a homeomorphism.

We know that \( \mathbb{R} \), with the standard topology, is a Hausdorff space.

By the Hausdorff Theorem on Homeomorphisms, since \( f \) is a homeomorphism, \( (0, 1) \) must also be a Hausdorff space.

In conclusion, by the theorem, the open interval \( (0, 1) \) is a Hausdorff space because it is homeomorphic to \( \mathbb{R} \), which already possesses the Hausdorff property.

This example illustrates how a continuous, bijective mapping between \( \mathbb{R} \) and an open interval like \( (0, 1) \) preserves the Hausdorff topological property.

The Proof

We start with the following assumptions:

  • \( f : X \to Y \) is a homeomorphism, meaning \( f \) is a bijective (injective and surjective) continuous function with a continuous inverse.
  • The space \( X \) is a Hausdorff space.

We need to prove that \( Y \) is also a Hausdorff space. That is, for any two distinct points \( y_1, y_2 \in Y \), there must exist disjoint open neighborhoods containing them.

Since \( f \) is surjective, there exist points \( x_1, x_2 \in X \) such that \( f(x_1) = y_1 \) and \( f(x_2) = y_2 \).

For two distinct points \( x_1 \ne x_2 \), there exist disjoint open neighborhoods \( U_1 \) and \( U_2 \) in \( X \), such that \( x_1 \in U_1 \) and \( x_2 \in U_2 \), since \( X \) is Hausdorff.

Because \( f \) is injective, \( f(x_1)=y_1 \) and \( f(x_2)=y_2 \) imply that \( y_1 \neq y_2 \).

Now, since \( f \) is continuous (as it is a homeomorphism by assumption), the sets \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) are open in \( Y \), as the continuity of \( f \) ensures that the image of an open set in \( X \) is open in \( Y \).

Thus, the images of the open sets \( U_1 \) and \( U_2 \) in \( X \) are open sets \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) in \( Y \).

Furthermore, the sets \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) contain \( y_1 \) and \( y_2 \), respectively, because \( f(x_1) = y_1 \) and \( f(x_2) = y_2 \).

Finally, the sets \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) are disjoint. If there were a point \( z \in f(U_1) \cap f(U_2) \), then \( z = f(x_1') = f(x_2') \) for some \( x_1' \in U_1 \) and \( x_2' \in U_2 \), which would contradict the fact that \( U_1 \) and \( U_2 \) are disjoint in \( X \), and that \( f \) is injective.

Therefore, we have found two disjoint open neighborhoods \( f(U_1) \) and \( f(U_2) \) in \( Y \), containing \( y_1 \) and \( y_2 \), respectively.

Thus, we conclude that the space \( Y \) is Hausdorff.

We have demonstrated that if \( f : X \to Y \) is a homeomorphism and \( X \) is Hausdorff, then \( Y \) is also Hausdorff.

And so on.

 

 
 

Please feel free to point out any errors or typos, or share suggestions to improve these notes. English isn't my first language, so if you notice any mistakes, let me know, and I'll be sure to fix them.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinLinkedin
knowledge base

Topology

Exercises